Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MALAK JEHANGIR KHAN AND OTHERS versus SARDAR ALI


In the appeal against section 302 (b) and 201 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the judicial confession was withdrawn only from the piece of evidence against the accused which, according to the High Court, also from any other independent evidence. Was not proved, nor was it denied. Evidence of illegal, inaccurate reading or evidence of bail for interference by the Supreme Court may be indicated. The verdict of acquittal of the accused was properly passed after the scrutiny of all the evidence collected by the prosecution.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from FR DI Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.