Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD HANIF THROUGH L.RS. versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VEHARI


Section 12 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 113 and Section 3 Defendant's specific performance suit to sell defendants, in the present case, the trial court did not press the issue of limitation, as The question could not be reopened by the appellate court. Firstly, the question of limitation in this case was not a pure question of law but a fact, and its decision depended on the existence as well as evidence of some facts before the time of the plaintiff's trial was declared as time bound. And secondly, the case filed by the plaintiff was also in the context that Article 113 of the Limitation Act, 1908, had no limitation.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Ugoki lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.