Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD HANIF THROUGH L.RS. versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VEHARI


Section 12 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 113 and Section 3 Defendant's specific performance suit to sell defendants, in the present case, the trial court did not press the issue of limitation, as The question could not be reopened by the appellate court. Firstly, the question of limitation in this case was not a pure question of law but a fact, and its decision depended on the existence as well as evidence of some facts before the time of the plaintiff's trial was declared as time bound. And secondly, the case filed by the plaintiff was also in the context that Article 113 of the Limitation Act, 1908, had no limitation.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Ghizer lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.