Find a Lawyer

ABDUL WAHAB versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL

Arts & 61 & Suits for Recovery of Money The documents on which the plaintiff relied on the plaintiff were alleged to have been forged, the result of illicit influence, repression and harassment, self-defense testimony. Defendant examined his lawyer in support of such defense not entered the house. The defense, which did not receive a lawyer in evidence, should have been defendant himself, who had to put himself in the witness box and specifically charged that his signatures were fake and my Also, the document was supported by the defendant without the support of a forged document. None of them were executed by him, would not be trusted. The defendant did not complain to any authority against the plaintiff on the charge of fraud, harassment, coercion and ineffective influence. Such defense requests contradicted each other, the defendant succeeded in setting his case. Failure to pay such defense and suit immunity by not appearing in the witness box nt to the plaintiff's suit was ruled in the circumstances best law firms from Chitral lawyer