MUHAMMAD AMIR versus STATE
Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 64 arrest ? Prior to arrest, the defendant's denial was designated in the FIR and the specific role of kidnapping the complainant's brother was attributed to him. At the trial, the application was filed twice for pre-arrest bail. , But on both occasions the same was dismissed for prosecution. The accused was misusing the ad interim bail discount on his pre-arrest bail. The accused was currently on interim bail. Police were not involved in the case. The alleged kidnapper was identified with the accused for more than a month, during which the kidnapper was suspected and the other abducted. After the release of the car, he was released to the investigating officer and released under section 161, CCPC. The statement was recorded in which they detail their abduction. The records of the pt accused and other persons in illegal detention indicate that there was more evidence linking the accused to the commission of the crime. The request for bail was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Kotla Pathan lawyer
