Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE versus STATE

Definitions of Section 2 (b (b)) of the evidence were not immediately recorded, the late post-mortem examination was conducted without any delay, with the possibility that it could not be ruled out. Time was devised to fabricate the story. Pieces of evidence The prosecution's witnesses were mutual and sisterly, and the victim was related to the victim. Interesting witnesses can be called. The incident was a nightly incident and the prosecution could not prove that there was light or lightning. Yes, both witnesses also failed to state the reason for their presence at the relevant time, the ocular account presented by both eyewitnesses was unreliable because the incident occurred in the dark when night came to light. There was no source Medical evidence was also contradictory to the Aculer Account SOF. There were doubts about the suspect's involvement in the case because the medical evidence of the alleged character was not supported and the evidence of the prosecutor depended. Were not able to, there was a previous rivalry between the parties and the account. It could not be trusted, unless it was supported by some independent piece of evidence, which lacked the rifle that had been recovered from the suspect in the living room, and was replaced by other homes. , But no one in the area was associated with it. The recovery process through the Investigation Officer Report of the Franz Science Laboratory was intended to work on the rifle recovered from the suspect. best law firm from Hunza Nagar lawyer