MALIL WASIL versus MUMTAZ-UR-REHMAN
O VII, R 11 Suit for malicious damages, retaining institutional suit The plaintiff's dismissal claimed to be dismissed on the basis that in another case, the defendants made some baseless and unreasonable allegations against themselves. Which badly affected his reputation. The said statement does not indicate any allegations that could hamper the credibility of the plaintiff, unless otherwise the case for recovery of damages was generally not applicable to the malpractice institution of the civil suit. That upon defeating the civil suit, the law granted it. In order to compensate the successful party by giving the costs / special costs to the courts below, the plaintiff's review case against the coordination finding of the facts of the court below was rightly dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Daulat Pur lawyer