Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAHIDA ADEEB versus NAUMAN EJAZ

Section 8 Distribution Act (IV 1893), Section 4 law evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 17, 79 and 84 Islamic law suit Proof of confession and confession of possession Comparison of signatures by the court in lieu of the gift of property The deceased owner of the property had two wives and the plaintiff had one wife, while the other wife was with the suit property The plaintiff sought distribution of the suit property, on which the defendant resisted on the basis that her husband was a dubber. The amount was increased. The trial court gifted the trial property to the plaintiff in favor of the trial. In the case of a Muslim woman, it is open to the husband that she can set the amount of the dover either before or after the marriage. There was sufficient marriage for, in the present case, 25 25 was in 1986 and Rs 50,000 was immediately reduced to writing in the presence of two witnesses who were fixed as Dewar but none of them. Even the witness was not produced before the court and failed to prove that the Dover amount has been increased from Rs 50,000 to Rs 15,000,000. Compared to the signatures of the parties, the parties, along with the passport, were available on the confessional process and were satisfied that the deceased's signature available on the passport did not match the identity of the victim on any of the identification cards and no oral gift to the defendant on behalf of the deceased. I was not subpoenaed or transmitted in writing by the deceased in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the appeal in which the judgment was upheld in favor of the plaintiff and the trial court. famous high court advocate from Mastoi lawyer