Find a Lawyer

SAHIB KHAN versus STATE

The benefit of the doubt against the breach of the Articles 302 and 404 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 417 evidence was contradicted in the gathering of the prosecution's witnesses, saying that the contradictions were material in nature and with respect to the presence of the witnesses on it. Suspicion was created. Vardhat's witnesses were not permanent at the location of the shooting and were unable to provide time to reach the police at Vardhat's location Medical evidence did not support ocular evidence The doctor was not sure of the distance. The recovery of the pistol and vacant at the time of the shooting and the incident could not be proved as they were recovered in the presence of the advisers who were not inspected and without the evidence of the rehabilitation counselors, it cannot be said that Recovery has been proven. Saturday was the witnesses were not consistent on the salient features of the incident The witnesses were related to each other and their accused did not affect e-trust All such matters raised suspicion in relation to the accused involved in the crime once If a reasonable doubt arises, the benefit will reach the accused until even one case will raise the suspicion of the accused's guilt and he will be entitled to the benefit as the appeal against the facts was dismissed. , Under the circumstances immigration advocates email from Choa Saiden Shah lawyer