Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus STATE

The testimony of Section 302 (b), the mitigating circumstances of the evidence, was fully explained to the witnesses by their presence that the presence of the day in the incident did not raise any question as to the identity of the accused. Who was previously aware of the prosecution's testimony. The suspect's injury to the arm was confirmed by medical evidence, but it does not appear to be a real problem, which was due to the immediate withdrawal of the suspect's older brother's former fiancee, under whose influence, In retaliation, he fired a single shot at the accused in his statement under Section 2342, the PC stated his age 18/19, but the trial court did not consider it and the accused was not charged by them. The request for verification of the application was rejected. The circumstances of the accused were found guilty but his death sentence was changed to life imprisonment. advocate for immigration from Parachinar lawyer