KHUDA BAKHSH AND OTHERS versus MUZAFFAR THROUGH L.RS.
Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was leased to the plaintiff in advance of the plaintiff's interest in the interest of the plaintiffs without the declaration of facts, but the government passed the order to restart the same suit. , They were ultimately ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. The High Court Some Plaintiffs / Applicants emphasized the decision and ruling by the High Court that the two Plaintiffs / Respondents were not entitled to the conclusions of the High Court-approved decree; The suit was about restoration of the land. No issue was targeted in this case, and in fact no one claimed that there was a lawsuit for this person claiming to be entitled, as this person claims to be the original lease. Heir / successor. If someone has a reservation about what someone else is entitled to, their treatment is always available. For this purpose, the Supreme Court refused to intervene in the decision and the decision to appeal the leave of the High Court was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Kohistan lawyer