Find a Lawyer

HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION versus SYED MUHAMMAD ALI GOHAR ZAIDI

R4 (1) (b) (v) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Backstage Benefits Recruitment Service Retirement Service Tribunal ordered reinstatement of employees, but to no avail Supreme Court employee's appeal Remand case to the service tribunal for consideration and assignment of credible reasons, and remand to the service tribunal on the issue of withholding benefits allowed to appeal against withholding, no inquiry by the service tribunal in this matter. Whether the employee was left without a job and doing no work during the intervention period, the legal business spanning over a decade The Service Tribunal neither recorded any oral evidence nor recorded the Service Tribunal's affidavit under oaths, in which case hereditary legal proceedings were faced and were not endorsed by any material but Earlier the theory was rejected. Service Tribunal After the remand of the case, the service tribunal should ask the parties to come to a final conclusion whether the employee has been unable to perform any work and has no suitable employment elsewhere during this period. However, such a case was not accepted at all, which left the service tribunal's attention unattended. The leave of appeal was changed to an appeal and the allowed decision was set aside and the service tribunal was remanded for a speedy decision as the trial proceeded. immigration advocates phone number from Mir Ali lawyer