Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN KHAWAJA versus STATE

Section 9 (a) (ix), (x), (xii) and 10 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Article 265 K Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Referring to the Constitution Petition to Attest the Proof of Accountability Court The defendant / accused was sent to the Administrative Judge's Accountability Court where he was facing trial on the reference charge against the accused by committing fraud with the accompanying accused, cheating people and the public. Broadly explained in the clauses through fraud. ix) (x) and (xii) under section 9 (a) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, the punishment can be punished under section 10 of the said ordinance and the accused was subsequently charged by the trial court and the prosecution. Some witnesses were also examined by the source. In support of this case, the petition filed by the accused under section 65, K, CCPC: Due to his conduct, after the dismissal, the accused had legalized filing a constitutional application. Although the applicant was not a civil servant to retain the NGS, the provisions of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, were extended to private individuals, who were charged with corruption and corruption, and / or in the names themselves. Have submitted property in their name. The properties of his family, Banimarz and / or associates he claimed to have owned by his family members, Banimarz and / or his associates proved that he was his own independent Was bought from the fund, earned, etc., but could not prove that the fugitive suspects were being arrested one after another and presented to the trial court at various stages of the trial. jobs for fresh advocates from Chaininda lawyer