Find a Lawyer

HAKIM ALI ZARDARI versus STATE

Section 10 Evidence Definition Benefit of Doubt The accused said that not all the prosecution's prosecution proceedings on the Income Tax brochures provided the exact picture of the accused's income as they did not disclose the total income at any amount. Exception was obtained. Failure to conduct a proper investigation or investigation to ascertain the known sources of income for the accused, apart from the sought-after property, the accused had several other properties, which were not mentioned in the prosecution, out of the said property. Real Estate was chosen. The prosecution failed to establish all the components of the crime, the burden of accounting for the property was not transferred to the accused, however, the accused explained his position in his detailed statement under Section 342, CR PC , Which was supported by various documents, a statement on the oath of his lawyer and the prosecution and defense witnesses, who gave a full account of how the property was purchased, and it was established that the accused obtained income from legitimate sources. The suspect was given the benefit of the doubt and was acquitted of the circumstances. list of supreme court advocates from North Wazirstan lawyer