Find a Lawyer

MEERAL ALIAS MEERO versus STATE

Delays in filing bail, arrest before Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 353, 148 and 149 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (3) The confirmation was not satisfactory. Although the driver of the underground vehicle had informed the police officer that the accused had taken the money, some mobile phones, documents and NIC but neither the driver nor any other passenger complained of the robbery. The names of any of the accused persons have been named, according to witnesses S, 161, the driver of the vehicle and the Investigation Officer through private witnesses under the PC did not even bother to identify the accused through private witnesses, In their statements to private witnesses under Section 161, the CRPC did not specify the cash and the number of mobile phones and documents that Was taken away and the FIR had only one common charge against the accused complainant. The counter lasted for about fifteen to fifteen minutes, during which both the police officers and the accused also fired the complainant. He was reported to have fired 30 shots at his government gun, and in connection with further shootings, other police officers had restored the numbers they had fired. The 28 branches from Wardhad's place were not in line with the number of bullets, as the FIR alleged that neither party was hurt. Further questioning of the accused is that he is entitled to accept the bail which was alleged. Due to enmity, could not be denied, pre-arrest bail granted to the accused top advocate from Khangah Sharif lawyer