Find a Lawyer

AFSAR ZAMAN versus AYUB KHAN

Articles 42 and 54 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O XX, R 5, O XLI, R 31, and section 115 were for the declaration and permanent injunction pending and the decision on each case was a permanent injunction, seven defendants Contested while the remaining defendants recognized the plaintiffs' claims and filed Iqbal claims in favor of the plaintiff, the trial court dismissed the case against the seven defendants and dismissed the case against the remaining defendants. Was acquitted by the appellate court. The following were based on the correct definition of evidence, which could not be interfered with by the High Court in its amending jurisdiction, especially when the plaintiffs did not read any false reading and evidence on record by the courts. Could not indicate that there is a lawyer's argument for the plaintiffs. The Appellate Court's unwanted decision is a violation of the mandatory provisions of O XLI, R 31, CPC. After the appellate court survived the case, the matter was adjourned and the matter was decided cautiously and the appellate court ruled on all dispute grounds and it did not appear that the defendants had any The prejudice has been dealt with. The appellate court was not required by law because, under OLLI, R31, CPC, the appellate court should state the points for determination, give its verdict on it, and mention the reasons for the decision. famous high court advocate from Chunian lawyer