Find a Lawyer

SHAHID UMER versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT

Section 12 (2) The auction application for fraud and misrepresentation request was granted by the applicant with the consent of the parties, Estoppel unable to disclose the principle of the Council applicable to the applicant. It was said that under Section 12, permission was obtained from the court for filing the petition. (2) In keeping with the orders of the High Court, the CPC, in which certain observations were made in this regard, nor was there any lawyer made for the petitioners nor the applicants themselves for 99 years. There was no objection to holding auction for leasehold rights in relation to the shop under question. Some kind of misrepresentation was made in court, which was done by the applicant himself when he agreed to auction for the rights of the leasehold in the said shop. Once the applicant agreed to this order when he waived his right to appeal and was barred from filing any further lawsuit, there was no doubt he had exceptions and, in appropriate cases, section 12 (2) ), The application may be submitted against the order / decree of consent under CPC, but the applicant was not able to show that the request attracted any such exception to the request. The issuer withheld the invoice order with his consent because it was approved with approval, the request was dismissed and the interim order approved. Or. ask a advocate free from Besham lawyer