FAZAL DAD versus COL.(RTD.) GHULAM MUHAMMAD MALIK
Section 5 435/7447/2727 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 6, 7A & 7B Terrorism Act transferred the case against the accused to the special court but the High Court Gone, under the use of constitutional jurisdiction. Put aside the order of transfer of the components of the importance of the crimes mentioned in section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, there was no connection with the contents of the FIR, nothing on record to show that It was brought out that this incident creates a feeling of terror, panic or protection among the people. The underground land grabber in the case against the accused was not eligible for terrorism proceedings under consideration of Section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, or his schedule was allowed by the High Court to move the matter to the General Court. It was
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Landi Kotal lawyer