Find a Lawyer

STATE versus CH. SHAHID HUSSAIN, ADVOCATE

The contempt of court was initiated by the Complainant Judicial Magistrate on the reference received from the District & Sessions Judge, a contempt of court / prosecution against the complainant / judicial magistrate, who prosecuted It was alleged that at the date and time of the incident when the request for bail presented by the Advocate was dismissed, he appeared in his court in an angry mood and in contempt of the dismissal of his dismissal request against the complainant. Language used The complainant explained that the defendant insisted on the grant of bail on a bail basis, but since the offense against his client was unauthorized, the bail was denied by the complainant, which was strictly in accordance with the law. The witness presented by the complainant was not an eyewitness to the incident, which the accused advocate had said against the complainant. Judicial officers mistreated the accused, but they did not add anything to the PR Ending their argument, counsel for the accused / plaintiff sought an apology with a promise made by the accused During the proceedings, the accused was highly respected and respected by the judiciary and all its organs, which spanned almost two years, he took a moment to look at the attitude of the accused advocate. After they came to the High Court in some important aspects of the matter, proceedings against the accused advocate were abandoned and without a pleasant relationship between the bar and the bench, a peaceful atmosphere was not created. property advocates from Gadoon Amazai lawyer