Find a Lawyer

MRS. RUKHSANA YAHYA versus NAZAZ ALI

A. XXIX, R 2 The Sindh Chief Court Rules (O Section), R 782 Service on Corporate Service The Directors Corporation / Company dispute was with respect to the service of the plaintiff company raised by the plaintiff by the plaintiff company. Company services were affected and this process did not need to be repeated once the defendant's service was good and the matter was resolved for submission of written statements, without giving any reason for the notice. Cannot be repeated without showing good cause, in fact the company was served and the law and defendant company There is no need to repeat the services of the manager and the director of the company, which was already being represented by a lawyer, because any prejudice in this regard was not likely to be due to the defendant company. Was granted

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• SHAHBAZ GARMENTS (PVT.) LTD. v. PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Finance, Revenue Division, Islamabad 2013 PTD 969
• TASHIF MEMON v. State 2013 MLD 971
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN v. PLASTICRAFTERS (PVT.) LTD. 2013 CLC 980
• KHADIM HUSSAIN v. GUL HASSAN TIWANO 2013 CLD 981
• ZAMBEER v. State 2013 MLD 997
• FAROOQ AHMED v. State 2013 YLR 998
• Dr. BABAR HUSSAIN v. S.H.O., POLICE STATION CITY COURTS, KARACHI 2013 PCrLJ 1002
• ARK GARMENTS INDUSTRY (PVT.) LTD. v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2013 CLD 1002

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

top advocate from FR Bannu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes