Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR versus STATE

The trial court found the benefit of the apparent delay in the FIR on section 10, 11 and 16 of the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), re-proof of section 338F, only under 16 under the Penalty for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979. He was sentenced and sentenced to seven years in prison, while the two accomplices were acquitted and the trial court sentenced the federal law court. Accuracy If the contents of the FIR, the statements of the complainant, and the statements of the prosecution witness and the victim were disputed, their statements did not correspond to each other on material points, the trial court found in the two co-accused. During the acquittal, the prosecution's statement, including the victim, was denied; therefore, it was necessary for the Federal Shariah Court to examine the evidence with proper caution and caution in order to retain the participant's nvication of the accused but the Federal Shariah Court evidence. Failure to test, the person making the contradictory statement cannot be credited with credibility And Zina (Enforcement hdud) Ordinance, was sentenced under Section 1979, which had a duty and responsibility. The courts preferred the reasons for sentencing to PPC, for reasons given under Section 833FF, and as a result of misrepresentation and non-reading of the record, the Supreme Court changed the appeal for leave and the accused. Excluded from the sentencing sentence. Courts were allowed below the appeal divorce advocates from More kunda lawyer