MUHAMMAD HANIF versus EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (O.P.S.) HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION, ISLAMABAD
The Labor Appellate Tribunal's complaint filed against the appellant seeking termination of his services by Sections 25A, 37 and 38 for suspension of service was rejected by the Labor Court on the ground that it was barred. Under the Labor Court order was approved. His face was wrong, because even if the appellant had already mistakenly referred to the service tribunal, and he had not referred to the Labor Court, the appellant then submitted a notice of complaint and two months. I filed a complaint petition, the appellant had to comply with the legal provisions, time passed. The complaint request could not be barred in this regard, dismissing the complaint as illegal and the tribunal set it aside and the matter was referred to the Labor Court with the direction of deciding the case on merit. Was.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
