Find a Lawyer

NAWAZ versus MATEEN AHMAD QURESHI

Sections 13 (2) (i), 6 and 15 Removal of the tenant on payment of rent by default The leaseholder has taken the previous action against the tenant and has passed the previous Part Execution Order against him as he is renting. The controller failed to appear before the tenant; instead of filing, the application for separation of the previous action or the previous order was filed before the appellate authority, which was dismissed and the tenant appealed the second appeal. Was filed, Valdetti Tenant was rightly forwarded to the former court because of the medical grounds. The court shall controller did not justify his absence. The lease rate was not denied by the tenant after he refused to accept the rent, he received the rent in dispute through a money order. Until the withdrawal request was filed in the payment of rent, the tenant did not have any explanation for the default during his term. Placing a money order and filing a withdrawal application, which purposely adopted its tenant attitude, did not even appear to support the tenant's claim for payment because he did not collect the rent. Even after filing an application for eviction under section 13 (6) of the West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959 by the Rent Controller, no case for interference in the second appeal was dismissed, it was dismissed. online advocate from Chakwal lawyer