MRS. AFROZE SHAH THROUGH ATTORNEY versus PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND ANOTHER
Seizure of goods before finalizing Section 2 (RR) and 168 decision-making proceedings shall be subject to any restrictions on the disposal of the jurisdiction pending disposition, while physical possession of the goods referred to as occupation or Will lose the right to use them by the owner of. The existence of custody and possession may have the effect of seizing it before finalizing the judicial proceedings once the import of the disputed goods or after notice of the owner is proved a crime under the Customs Act, 1969, the goods shall be immediately And may be subject to such seizure. Before the seizure is termed as an interim action
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
