Find a Lawyer

SHAHD MENA versus GUL SADA KHAN

Section Declaration for the Plaintiff's Case The declaration was sought regarding the claim that he was the owner of the suit land and that the alteration of the said land certified in favor of the plaintiff was fraudulent. And so it was ineffective for his rights to be illegal, in the trial the plaintiff's continued dismissal, in review, alleging that he was an illiterate, ignorant, harassed woman and the defendant had all his property in dispute in his name. The part was moved with fraud. The defendant claimed that the change in the sale of the property in the dispute proved in his favor and that he had considered the sale to the plaintiff and that the plaintiff was fully aware of the sale transaction. The plaintiff himself admitted in his statement when he was examined as a plaintiff. The witness also admitted in his statement that in his presence three women, including the plaintiff, had pasted a thumb impression on the transfer through which the land was transferred to the plaintiff in the name of the plaintiff, the evidence said. The plaintiff was not only aware of the sale transaction, but was also fully aware of the fact that the defendant had built his suit on the property Moore, 10 years before the date of the filing of the lawsuit, the evidence available on record by the courts Was properly appreciated, read any false writings / evidence or was illegal or in the absence of any material malpractice, Any legal errors or defects have been identified in the Inadmissible Results. The exercise of its jurisdiction to modify, by the courts of competent jurisdiction, cannot be interfered with by the High Court. \ r \ n list of supreme court advocates from Kotla Arab Ali Khan lawyer