LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus MUHAMMAD SAIFULLAH
Section 54 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Section 96 and 115 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 suit for permanent injunction in filing an appeal, trial for trial The Appeal Court dismissed the appeal, which was also filed by the banned applicants. The delay in filing an appeal before the Appellate Court cannot be fully excused on the basis that the applicants were state workers and they needed some time to ask for permission to file an appeal. The delay in filing an appeal before every day was not explained in their application under section 5 of the Court, Limitation Act, 1908; the appellate court had properly rejected the inappropriate applicants and the law Review request filed beyond the time specified by was not executed. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
