MST. SHAISTA SHAMIM versus STATE
Sections 9 and 12 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioner Maintenance Petitioner challenged a part of the judgment of the Accountability Court, which, in addition to punishing or punishing the accused, also seized some of the applicant's property. Was directed while the applicant was also confiscated while making the decision. His appeal in the appeal was moved to suspend part of the decision to seize his property, but he withdrew his request and once filed a constitutional petition under Article 199 of the constitution, While in custody, he moved the High Court separately. Appeal against the entire judgment, it may provide for the relief always claimed in the appeal process Option to grant interim relief by complete or partial suspension, the action of the order appealed against it is always in the jurisdiction of the appellate or central appeal. The constitutional petition was not enforceable in view of such a constitutional petition.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Mamu kunjan lawyer