Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HUSSAIN versus STATE

Section 2302 () Appraising evidence The eye witnesses, the deceased's real brother, were not present with him at the time of the incident, nor did he take the deceased to the hospital, saying that witnesses were recovered. And the police registered a case after deliberating and consulting the case, but the intended purpose of the prosecution was not established when the prosecution witnesses failed to agree when the accused was arrested, A blood-stained knife was recovered from the suspect's possession that day. His arrest was suspected, despite the availability of 5/7 public witnesses at the site of the rehabilitation, none of them were presented as retrieval witnesses, nor did they violate the provisions of section 103. , PC theft was not recovered from exclusive ownership. The defendant did not wipe the knife with the knife for seven days, but the recovery of the knife from his recovery was not reliable. Medical evidence was contradicted by ocular evidence. The accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Sagri lawyer