SADDAR DIN versus MEHBOOB ELAHI
Section 30 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 suits the respondents for the specific performance of the contract to sell the plaintiff in favor of the applicants for the specific performance of the contract to sell, and the balance later The respondents failed to perform their part of the agreement. Applicants filed a lawsuit for the specific performance of the contract. After the trial, the appellate court rejected the trial court's ruling and order. Had received a remand for the case. After the assertion / acquisition of ownership rights, the Suite Property Government Land (Punjab) has gone out of the pale of the provisions of the Colonization Act, 1912, because under section 30 of the Government Land Colonization Act, the property in question is left in the 1912 Act. Subject to the statement of any conditions under the suit, the state was properly filed without disregarding the circumstances but, after the acquisition of the proprietary rights, the state had no interest in the suit property, the appellate court upheld the trial court. There was no grounds for appellate court to grant the remand, while the remand order was not passed. After it was passed. It has been concluded that the material available on the record was not sufficient or that evidence led by the parties was unnecessary and it was absolutely necessary to seek remand. had gone.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Vehari lawyer