GULZAR MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Sections 302, 324, 109 and 34 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), a complainant complimenting the evidence of section 555, appeared before the court and filed an affidavit under section 561A, CR PC I have been told that she had a husband. And because of some misunderstandings and the provocation of police officers, she was forced to act as complainant in the case. The lady added in her affidavit that she had not removed anything against her husband and The accused / her husband was on duty at the time of the crime; that the accused was shocked and mentally disturbed due to misunderstanding and did not file an appeal within the stipulated time and his delay was due to his maladministration. This happened because of the statements of the witnesses allegedly present at the time of the incident, this did not happen. It has been proved that the accused committed the crime and / or was present at the time of the incident; no other indirect action was assigned to the accused prosecution, which failed to prove the case against the accused, under invalid judgment. The accused was sentenced and sentenced. And the accused was acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Sibi lawyer