Find a Lawyer

FAZAL ELAHI versus KAMAL DIN

Section 42 Civil Code of Conduct (V8 1908), OIR 8 and O XLI, R 4 Appeal Retention Material Misconduct and the Plaintiff's Case by Illegal Plaintiffs It was held that the appeal was not enforceable because the two defendants. Only one of the parties was prepared because the competence record of one party in the appeal established that the other plaintiff was not prepared as a party in the appeal even though it was a party. The suit was necessary to represent the other plaintiff and there was no compensation because the appellate court was fatal to the proceedings, no attempt was made to amend the appeal at any stage, such material irregularity and illegality. Was not in accordance with the provisions of the appeal. A. XLI CPC, the proceedings before the appellate court were without jurisdiction, and the decision passed by the appellate court rejected the amendment, which allowed the amendment. n conditions solicitors from Jaja Abasian lawyer