Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS.69/PB AND 70/PB OF 2001-02, DECIDED ON 6TH AUGUST, 2004. versus I.T.AS. NOS.69/PB AND 70/PB OF 2001-02, DECIDED ON 6TH AUGUST, 2004.

Section 23 (1) (xxi) deductions cannot be accepted Markup Secure Assisi was a banking company, which was an undisclosed part of the markup from customers for 1998 and 99 and 1999 2000, whose first appeal authority was amended by the Assisi. Claimed the effect. The nature of the CLL (xxi) of subsection (1) of section 23 of section 23 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was natural and according to the markup reserve account it was claimed that during the estimation years (1 xxi) Should be validated. ) Section 23 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, is not defined or clarified, but rather with a specific date of effect, that is, on July 1, 2000, with a clear intention, but in the strict sense the financial constitution should be formulated. If a new legislation has been introduced or a new definition has been added or a sensible supply has been inserted, or the scope of a provision has been substantially increased / charged, or the effects of expanding it Unless it is defined by the Legislature unless there is a specific history of its specific date, there is no scope for confusion as to the date of its operation on July 1, 2000. And as such, it will likely work as the Appellate Tribunal retained the first appellate authority's finding. famous lower court advocate from Chilas lawyer