Find a Lawyer

HAJI KHALID MAHMOOD versus ABDUL HAMID

Section 22 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Les Pendens, applying the principles of applicable decree, fraud and misrepresentation aside, the applicants were suits property buyers in the absence of this case. Earlier, a court meter was decided against the sellers to the Supreme Court, the applicants filed a petition under the High Court 5 12 (2) CPC, accusing them of fraud and misrepresentation. The document was rejected. All the decisions and orders were on merit and the applicants got interest after the competition from both parties. The suit property paint light was bound by the decisions and orders of the courts below, and the High Court's ruling in the revision petition, as well as the principle of lace pendence, could have led to the Supreme Court's decision in extraordinary cases, and even to a third party. Claims of prejudice that were not applied to the proceedings and law of interest were obtained The claimants failed to identify any wrongdoing or wrongdoing on the record, even though they were allegedly involved in any fraud and misconduct. Suggested, there is no evidence of any bald claim by this, any objection In the absence of support from the record by the D, the High Court refused to dismiss the decisions and orders. Applicants purchased property during the litigation. lawer from fb area from Mandra lawyer