BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, GUJRANWALA THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus ZEESHAN AHMAD
Sections 10 (vii) and 29 Calendars, Rule 11 of the Intermediate and Secondary Education Board, Rule 11 Review and Review the Respondent Plaintiff's Concerns About its Islamic Papers (A&B) in Intermediate Examination Claimed to have made the announcement. The defendant was unlawful, invalid and based on economic utility and that the investigation was not done in accordance with the law The defendant did not ask for a re-evaluation of his answer hooks. Both the courts had re-reviewed the respondents' books and their decisions were based on misreading and non-reading of evidence, which resulted in a misunderstanding of justice, and such matters. Was set aside and the case presented to the plaintiff was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Kalaswala lawyer