SAEED AHMAD AWAN versus REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
Four and 7 misdemeanors removal from employment The offense of removal from the job was levied by a civil judge / judicial magistrate, after an inquiry against him that he was not writing the verdict / order, even after the inquiry officer Is said to be accused of corruption. It could not be proved that the inquiry officer was constituted after the charge of irrelevance, but on the recommendation, the judicial officer of the High Court recommended a modest fine on the censor, recommending a gentle attitude. The trial judge imposed a heavy fine on removing employees from the job. The allegation of misconduct against a civil servant was not proven to be anywhere that the public servant was either dishonest or had committed an act that implied misconduct. The Judicial Officer was, that he had 31 judicial files in his chamber, without written verdicts and orders. As a Judicial Officer, it was his duty to ensure that steps were taken to remedy it. There was nothing available in the record that the Judicial Officer made any attempt to fix the situation and the inquiry officer showed negligence in this matter. There was no allegation of dishonesty or misconduct against the judicial officer for seeking some degree of disqualification to justify the censorship fine recommended by the judicial officer, and his professional performance is worth it. That their case was not fair. The impugned order of competent authority was set aside to increase the penalty, it was restored to employment with all the benefits.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
