Find a Lawyer

CYNAMID PAKISTAN LTD., KARACHI versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND ANOTHER

Sections 19, 30 and 31A Section RO 350 (I) / 85, Dated 16 4 1985 Section RO 496 (I) / 88, Dated 26 6 1988 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution, Exception, Goods Claim for importation Entry of bills of entry from bond under privileged section R 350 I 350 (I) / B 16 6 198 8 198 8 198 Disallowance of bill of entry by authority to authority and non-payment of duty 6 28 6 1998 to till till 1998, when such exemption was withdrawn by Section R 49 6 66. I) /, d, dated 6 authority 6 198 8 The refusal of the authority to accept the importer's waiver claim in 1988 surpasses the validity of the registration by the bond beyond any reasonable doubt that the duty payment is delayed by any In the absence of such proof that is also due to ignorance, condolences or cheapness of the importer, the importer cannot be denied the benefit of such privileged information. The claim was filed on 16 6 1988, thus, the importer cannot be denied the benefit because Section RO 350 (1) / 88, in the date of 26 26 1988, section 31 before 26 6 1988. Before the supply of A, it could not act out of frustration to deprive its importer of the right to it. The facts of the present case of the Customs Act, 1969 will not apply. The High Court accepted the constitutional petition, set aside the anonymous order and allowed the importer's waiver claim. \ R \ n \ r \ n jobs for advocates from Domeli lawyer