IMTIAZ ALI versus STATE
Section 497 Control of the Narcotic Sub-Maturity Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 guarantees, the delivery of the contents of the FIR and the Recovery and Detention Counsel, clearly states that in the possession of the accused in the form of PTS. 20kg of hashish was allegedly recovered. Plates, but the number of plates / plates was not mentioned, neither in the FIR nor in the advisory FIR and advisories stated that 250 grams of the whole exported material for the purpose of chemical analysis The amount of water was removed, but without any indication of whether each patty / plate was extracted separately, or just one of them. There was no mention of whether the Patties were sampled separately. And if taken out separately, it was not mentioned that he was ever sealed separately by the recovery officer, the accused was admitted in bail, under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Pirpai lawyer