Find a Lawyer

M.A. (REVISED GROUND) NO.282/KB AND I.T.A. NO.184/KB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 28TH JUNE, 2005. versus M.A. (REVISED GROUND) NO.282/KB AND I.T.A. NO.184/KB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 28TH JUNE, 2005.

Appellate Tribunal Amendment Appeals on the basis of Sections 134, 13 (1) (AA), 66 (1) (C) and 25 (C), adding, modifying, changing or disregarding any basis of appeal Application of SC / Defendant, when the appeal was preferred by the department, the appeal was preferred by the department, as it is the sole custodian of the appeal, special to keep the issue limited to any case. Had, in its own right, sought, through the application, to cover its error, to resolve the matter without filing an appeal against it as the cause of the appeal as the respondent. I had no right to demand to increase, if not destined to be also matters. The decision, or the wrongful decision-maker, will not in any case entitle the SC to be involved in the grounds of appeal preferred by the Department. The debtor, as well as the reviewer, will be allowed to argue on an appeal basis that is not related to the departmental appeal, which affects relief in favor of the SC on relevant matters, without additional appeal being filed, additional grounds are allowed. In the circumstances, it would be equivalent to asking the department to look at the diagnostic interest in the appeal, as well as disappointment in addition to the right to withdraw the appellant's appeal, the law called for the appellate tribunal to decide the matter. To appeal the appellate tribunal did not provide any clause from which the appellate tribunal Attention may be requested. The appeal case and no appeal was preferred for it, so no question arose as to the appeal hearing in this case. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Dhirkot lawyer