Find a Lawyer

AMANAT ALI versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, LAHORE

The vehicle detained at Section 6A6A and 505050 Superddy was being sought by the applicant. The CCP was illegal because it was a conscientious buyer and owner of the said vehicle and was seized under section 505050. The applicant was that there was no competitor to this vehicle nor involved in any criminal case, nothing was on record to show that the vehicle was stolen in any property or any criminal Involved in the case, the vehicle documentation was properly maintained. The applicant only asked about the chassis panel, which was allegedly refitted and re-mauled, which was evidence of what could be seen in the trial when maintaining the vehicle in police custody. It would not have been possible to make any progress in this matter for an indefinite period. This means nothing, but the entirety, destruction and damage that cannot be allowed under any provision of the law, documents, included with the application, the documents were told by the applicant, Whether they want to own the car Question At least if a competitor's request was approved, the vehicle was handed over to the applicant at Superddy ly r \ n \ r \ n online advocate from Khushal Kot lawyer