GHULAM MUSTAFA versus STATE
Section 497 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 Punitive Regulation (XLV of 1860), Section 452/34 Guarantee, Denial of Crime of the accused Section 497, CR under the prohibited clause of the PC And there was a charge against it. Even the chemical inspector's report confirmed that the accused did not succeed in presenting a further investigation because the police declared the accused innocent only on the basis of the innocent and the niyah, which could not be assigned otherwise The search was not binding on the courts serious allegations that the case was registered in the commission of the rape deal because there was no fatal in that case because the complainant had to think a hundred times before registering the case. That included honoring the whole family. The accused failed to identify any misconduct by the complainant or the alleged victim in this case as a false involvement.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Saidu Sharif lawyer
