EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER SCHOOLS AND LITERACY, DISTRICT DIR LOWER versus QAMAR DOST KHAN
Sections 4 and 7 of the Northwest Frontier Province Service Tribunals Rules, 1974, R 27 Service Tribunal jurisdiction directs department officials, the absence of a final order was the complaint of public servants that they were appointed as PTC teachers. I was modified, they were not posted anywhere Service Tribunal Appeals filed by government employees and the department were instructed to issue a posting order which was taken by the Ply authorities was that the service tribunal. Had no jurisdiction to issue instructions to them and filed them by government employees. Li was not applicable because it was not the final order. The purpose of R27 of the Northwest Frontier Province Service Tribunals Rules 1974 was not to expand the scope of Section 4 of the Northwest Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act of 1974, the power available to the service tribunal during the hearing of such appeal and appeal. ? Responding to Sections 4 and 7 of the Northwest Frontier Province, there was no such order under Section 4 of the Provincial Service Tribunals Act, 1974, the Northwest Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act, 1974, which was claimed by public servants through appeals. Earlier, the North West Frontier Province Tribunal Relief could be brought under challenge. Specifically, in the form of a command to the Department Authority to give proper posting to civil servants, public servants were seeking a writ of mandamus, under whose jurisdiction the service tribunal did not approve the application for leave of appeal. And the decision passed by the service tribunal was decided on one side
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Pindi Bhattian lawyer