MUHAMMAD ZAHID versus DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS AND LITERACY, N.-W.F.P. PESHAWAR
In response to Arts 204 and 19 Constitutional petition, the High Court in its judgment urged the Applicants to initiate contempt proceedings against the Respondents with proof of their requests and review and remand according to the requests. Give up Applicants were of the view that after the High Court decision, they submitted some documents / testimonies before the Committee, but the Committee was unable to consider even the excuse that at this stage the documents asked to avoid complication. Applicants' position was that the defendants had insulted the court for not considering such documents by the High Court ordering the applicants to submit additional documents to the committee. There was also no mention of the applicants in the High Court decision Uastyn of which were former with applications that take account of their evidence. The error of selection and appointment of candidates was completed on the basis of the record available at the time of such exercise, which the applicant objected to and the exercise should be re-examined for evidence of eligibility purposes. Cannot reopen closed presentation chapter Schedule for submission of applications and documents, candidates were obliged to submit their documents within that period, on the basis of such records, the candidates' eligibility was checked and accordingly qualified candidates for test / interview. Calls were issued. , Other people have some right to priority and appointment
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
