Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF

Section 25 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), I IX, R 13 and O XXI, R 10 suit pre-order application was subject to payment of cost to set the preceding order, non-payment of cost The application for will be rejected. It was approved by the reviewing court after not submitting pre-discrimination in any way, including the Fifth Extension, but said that the order was successfully passed through a writ petition. The plaintiff / annoying ambassador filed a civil appeal in the Supreme Court. The filing was allowed and the order of the review court was restored. The claimant / vendor of the execution of the injunction proceeded with the argument that a fresh trial could only be heard on the matter in the wake of the Supreme Court order and stated before the order was not implemented. Trial adjourned. The court made it clear that the amendment was extended in time for the payment of the money before the court order, so that the defendant of the reef was given time to submit the said amount as far as the previous order was concerned. It was stated that the matter was not subject to lace before the Additional District Judge, the High Court or the Supreme Court. As a result, the preceding order is still in the field and in the presence of any legal weakness and defect of the jurisdiction the Appellate Court. Can't interrupt search. best advocate from Mangi lawyer