MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus STATE
Section 426 of the Explanation Code (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b) and 34 of the suspension were found between the trial account and medical evidence for the collision and the evidence of the motive and the alleged recovery of the accused was not considered. On the basis of which the accused was claimed. During the hearing of the main appeal, the convict and the convict were sentenced, needed to be re-examined, application was allowed and the accused was suspended.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Ubaro lawyer
