ARSHAD MEHMOOD versus STATE
Section (c) could not be left unfounded before submitting a final report to the disputed views of the two investigating officers. One of the two opinions was that the police had recovered a large quantity of drug paraphernalia, according to a senior team. The matter needs to be re-investigated.The police officers so as not to punish the actual culprits The High Court observed that if the sub-inspector of the police had forged a false case to punish innocent people, It should be dealt with strictly in accordance with the law and if it was found that D-Section P (Investigation) had offered a false story, Some of the suspects should be allowed to escape punishment and then put to work according to the law. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer
