KHADIM THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF
The plaintiff's complaint was that the plaintiffs' complaint was that the two courts below relied on the local commissioner's report and not the report with other evidence in place of the record. Had read that both the courts should have been put down. The report of the Local Commissioner in the Justices position along with the remaining evidence of the claimants and if they did so, they concluded that the order of possession should have been approved by the defendants only after the submission by which Contradictions of the signs were appearing between statements of witnesses made. The plaintiff, when viewed in the light of the report, did not appear before the local commissioner to support his report in the trial court or to subject himself to scrutiny, reliance on such report was inappropriate and unsafe. The revision jurisdiction was exercised, set aside. Concurrent decisions of both the courts below
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Vehari lawyer
