Find a Lawyer

APPEAL NO. CUS. 264/PB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 23RD FEBRUARY, 2006. versus APPEAL NO. CUS. 264/PB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 23RD FEBRUARY, 2006.

Sections 2 (s), 16, 156 (1), (8), (9), (89), 187 and 194A Imports and Exports (Control) Act (XNXX of 1950), section 3 (1) ) Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 279, 320 and 337 Sections RO 374 (I) / 2002, dated 16 6 2002 The smuggling of vehicles in this entry was not related to the seizure of this entry and the same other model. And the chassis plate of the seized vehicle was not repaired but the entire chassis plate was replaced. A vehicle owner complained that the welding marks found on his chassis could be the result of repairing the vehicle and replacing the damaged parts with it. The model 1986 model 1983 was not available for parts of the market and could not repair or impose smuggling, including seat belts or mud guards, etc. The property seizure agency declared the seized vehicle smuggled, primarily But because physically the vehicle was a 1986 87 model which was white, while according to the entry book, it was a 1983 model with a green and laboratory report, it reported that it had The chassis number was changed and relied on the welded material by the agency were variable factors and the owner believed that The car was not modified in the face of a fatal accident. And the replacement of body parts with fake conspiracies and parts of different model vehicles cannot be ruled out during repairs when the owner has received a laboratory report of the incident after the accident and the agency that seized the back Had to bring a laboratory report. File in accordance with the law, so that the owner can provide it to the specialist online advocate from Killa Saifullah lawyer