Find a Lawyer

MESSRS M.B. INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., MULTAN, THROUGH MANAGING versus MST. SHAHNAZ AKHTAR

Sections 13, 14, and 15 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act (of 1913), section 15 and 21, return of trial nomination for pre-arrest return of court fee after recording of the evidence of the plaintiff when the evidence of the defendant While the recording was being postponed, the decision was filed by the plaintiff of the Shariat Appellate Bench of the Supreme Court which stated that since the case was disqualified due to the judgment of the Supreme Court, They were allowed to withdraw the case and the plaintiff also requested the court to refund the fee, but the suit was dismissed, but The court fee was not returned by the trial court on the ground that it had no jurisdiction to do so. Several cases were pending in the judgment of Judicial Syed or were filed thereafter, they were disqualified under the strategy of the Supreme Court. It is likely that Malala could be sued by the plaintiff for filing a claim which was disqualified due to the judgment of the apex court after the plaintiff's institute. In suppressing the case, the case was chosen to be withdrawn and thus the court's burden could be reduced. It will be in the interest of justice that the plaintiff be ordered to return the plaintiff's court fees paid by the plaintiff as prayed by the plaintiff \ r \ n list of supreme court advocates from Tarbela lawyer