NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN versus MESSRS OVERSEAS TRADING SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR AND 5 OTHERS
Following the satisfaction of the execution of Articles 17 and 27, the recovery costs of the funds, the recovery of the first execution request was excluded for non-prosecution The second execution request was dismissed because the bank made the figures. A certificate of recovery was issued after which the petitioner filed a third execution petition seeking recovery of the expenditure of the funds, which was also issued by the court. The validity of the ordering bank shows that he felt satisfied with the order passed in the second execution request and at no time was the court challenged. Beyond the injunction, if there was any harm to the prosecutors, it was due to the negligence, negligence and conduct of their own officials, who could not identify, at the time of the execution of the second sentence, the funds. The costs were still to be recovered or / and failed to file an appeal against such order. The holder also did not choose. The order regarding the execution of such order in the instant appeal was legal. And it did not need intervention by the High Court, so the situation was maintained in the circumstances r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Khanbel lawyer