Find a Lawyer

FAKIR ALI BUX versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH HOME DEPARTMENT, KARACHI

In Section 3 and 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 204 and 1991 Constitutional Petition, the petitioner, in his earlier constitutional petition, claimed that in connection with the land dispute, the plaintiff between him and the claimant applicant. The case was underway. The Mukhtarkar and Section HO persons alleged that he was threatening and threatening to change his land and that the Department HA had threatened to take action against him under 5 107. , CR PC Section H0, in response to a notice issued by the High Court, appeared and stated that it had neither harassed nor offered the applicant's State Counsel. Mukhtarkar will not take any action against the applicant against the law and if any action has been taken, it will be strictly resolved in accordance with the law. In light of the above statements, the applicant subsequently filed an application under Articles 204 and Sections of the Constitution, 3 and 4 of the contempt of court Act, 1976, alleging that Mukhtarkar had modified the rights record in respect of the suit land. Affecting the petitioner, he has committed contempt of court by resorting to harassment. The legal variable in question was registered on the basis of the registered sale deadline. What Mukhtarkar was required to do under the law and this was not a violation of Mukhtarkar's earlier statement in the court that he would not take any action in violation of the law anywhere it was not alleged that the court No restrictions are imposed on such changes. Under this restriction, Mukhtarkar was tried before the court when you need a advocate from Narowal lawyer