Find a Lawyer

NIZAM ASSOCIATES THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND 3 OTHERS

Section 15, 16 and 181 Notifications Section RO 374 (I) / 02, Dates 15 6 02 and Section RO 574 (I) / 05, Dated 6 6 2005 Import Policy Order, 2005 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Import Restriction of Goods Delivery Goods upon payment of a fine The import contract was taken by the importer to release the redemption notification section RO 374 (I) / 02, dated 15 6 2002, they were already prohibited. Had agreed to import goods and the payment of such goods, therefore, he was entitled to take advantage of the redemption notification. In the case of Prohibition, the same thing happened when goods crossed the customs boundary. It was only when the prohibition and the simultaneous confiscation that a question on the terms of the redemption could be sought could be made on the day when the goods in question had arrived in Pakistan, the new notification section RO 574 (1) / 05, dated 6 2005. Has already been implemented in the country and the redemption notification has already been withdrawn, thus canceling the importer's notification Notification RO44 (I) / 02, dated 15 6 2002, the Customs Act 1969 lifted by the importer. Contrary to the scheme of section 15 or 16, which envisaged the importation or export penalty of prohibited goods or other consequences and not the goods petition on such import contracts. lim was limited to r \ n \ r \ n top advocates from Kashmir lawyer